Make it demonstrable where your organisation stands
Article 4 of the EU AI Act asks for AI literacy that fits the role, fits the context and can be demonstrated. The scan produces that evidence in two to three weeks, at a fixed price, and ends with a learning plan you can actually run.
WHAT YOU GET
Four outcomes, one document
Your position on article 4
Where your organisation stands against the AI literacy obligation, worked out per job family rather than as one organisation-wide score.
The AI use that is already there
Including the use that is not on the procurement list: people working through personal accounts, tools in pilots, AI that arrived inside software you already had.
Tier classification
What can continue, what cannot, and what can under conditions. Tied to the risk categories in the Act.
Report and learning plan
One document your board, council and regulator can read, with a concrete order of steps for the twelve months after, including who learns what.
HOW IT RUNS
Three weeks, from intake to handover
01
Week 1 · intake and survey
A conversation with the board or the CISO, a short survey among staff, and access to policy, procurement and running pilots.
02
Week 2 · measurement and depth
Conversations per job family, a check on what is actually being used, and classification of the systems that surface.
03
Week 2 to 3 · handover
Report, tier classification and learning plan, presented in person to the board or management team.
EXAMPLE
What an organisation of 900 people gets back
The example below is composed from what we typically find in this type of organisation, not from one existing engagement. It shows what an outcome looks like: first what is actually happening, then what goes into the report.
What the scan found
- Four departments were working with an AI assistant, two of them through personal accounts outside the managed environment.
- One team had a model reading along with citizen objections. Who checks the decision, and how that is recorded, was written down nowhere.
- Procurement conditions did not mention AI, while two suppliers had already shipped it inside existing software.
- Sixty of the 900 staff had taken a training at some point. There was no overview of who can do what, per role.
What went into the report
- Role profiles: per job family what someone needs to know and be able to do, and why that applies to that role.
- Tier classification of six applications: three could continue, two under conditions, one had to stop.
- Four questions that now travel with every software purchase.
- A twelve month learning track with a re-measurement, plus the passage the council and the works council get to see.
The board and the secretary received the report in a single session. The tier classification was adopted that same week; the learning track went into the following year's training plan.
Ready to know where you stand?
Fill in the form or email me. You get a reply within one working day, with a proposal for a 30 minute intro call.